Readers reply: Experts say we should use passkeys, but can a smartphone pin really be safer than a password?

**TL;DR:** Readers reply: Experts say we should use passkeys, but can a smartphone pin really be safer than a password?

---

The long-running series in which readers answer other readers’ questions on subjects ranging from trivial flights of fancy to profound scientific and philosophical concepts This week’s question: Is ‘ripen at home’ fruit the supermarkets’ idea of a joke? I’ve been struggling to get my head around the idea that a passkey, which can be a pin on your phone, or facial recognition, can be safer than using a complicated password and two-factor authentication.

I get that having something unique to your device, not stored on a company’s server, is unphishable and less hackable by cybercrims, but what if your phone is nicked and someone guesses the password? And what if you lose your phone? Continue reading...

Source: The Guardian Technology

Tech news is rarely just a gadget headline. We frame what changed, who benefits, and what to watch next as details firm up.

Even when details are thin, these stories matter because they signal direction: pricing, policy, platform behavior, or security posture can shift quickly once momentum builds.

Track whether the story affects total cost of ownership: subscriptions, compatibility, downtime risk, or support burden.

1) If money or security is involved, wait for primary sources. 2) Test changes on a small scale before committing. 3) Note what would falsify your current assumptions.

**Q: Is everything in this article confirmed?** A: The summary reflects publicly reported information at publication time. Analysis sections are clearly framed as context, not new reporting.

**Q: Will iByte update this page?** A: Yes. As primary sources publish more detail, this article can be refreshed without changing the URL.

Last updated: June 16, 2026.

Additional context: early-cycle stories often look bigger in headlines than in day-to-day impact. The useful move is to identify the smallest set of facts that would change your decision, then wait for those facts to land.

Additional context: early-cycle stories often look bigger in headlines than in day-to-day impact. The useful move is to identify the smallest set of facts that would change your decision, then wait for those facts to land.

Additional context: early-cycle stories often look bigger in headlines than in day-to-day impact. The useful move is to identify the smallest set of facts that would change your decision, then wait for those facts to land.

Additional context: early-cycle stories often look bigger in headlines than in day-to-day impact. The useful move is to identify the smallest set of facts that would change your decision, then wait for those facts to land.